As unlikely as this development will be, I think Trump’s
election makes the prime case for a national and for that matter; an international
vetting of heads of state as a mandatory arrangement . . . UN please take note!
Tests for understanding the world situation, a broad
education to a high level, psychological profiling and very important; long
experience of successful political leadership. Mrs May would come out well on
this analysis.
Surely there must be at the very minimum a level of
political experience in a prospective president as an essential requirement?
What qualities do a
game show host or property developer or for that matter a religious leader as
in the case of Muslim prime ministers have to do with the complex diplomatic,
informed leadership required for such a demanding role on the world forum. Obama did have those
qualifications as does Hillary Clinton.
Trump reminds me of the predicament of film characters such
as those played by Norman Wisdom or Charlie Chaplin where the man in the street
is suddenly and mistakenly elevated to a position of authority; they fail
hilariously. Unfortunately Trump is a real person. He has advisers galore, a
civil service and secret service to help him but surely they must be gagging at
the public’s choice?
The relevant question is; can they steel themselves to help
this ego on legs or will they give up and call for an end to the farce in an
impeachment? Who can say?
Will people now realise that the job of president is a
matter of a highly developed political nous not just being a TV personality and
trashy demagogue? Will the American public tolerate a political system in
future which permits an unqualified but popular ignoramus to lead them?
Or perhaps that what they really want?